<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Obligated to Follow Back?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/</link>
	<description>Twitter Tips in 140 Characters or More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sell porn</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-86165</link>
		<dc:creator>sell porn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 07:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-86165</guid>
		<description>There is absolutely no obligation to follow someone back.I actually list my email address on my twitter account (it’s part of my background). BTW, if you have any traffic questions feel free to email me and I will help you out NicksTrafficTricks at gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is absolutely no obligation to follow someone back.I actually list my email address on my twitter account (it’s part of my background). BTW, if you have any traffic questions feel free to email me and I will help you out NicksTrafficTricks at gmail.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USpace</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-76527</link>
		<dc:creator>USpace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 05:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-76527</guid>
		<description>There of course is no obligation to follow someone back.  However, if someone wants traffic from twitter they have to get more and more followers.  But if they aren&#039;t already famous, or a major brand, or an exceptionally interesting and original tweeter, they will probably never get to KEEP all their followers that they do get.

This is because once someone is following 2,001 they can&#039;t follow any more until they&#039;re being followed by at least only 10% less followers.

For example, someone being followed by 2,000 can not follow more than 2,200.  So, as most people reach the 2,001 following limit they are usually being followed by less so they have to unfollow people in order to follow new people, this includes following back their new followers. 

So, unless a certain Tweeter is famous or especially interesting, they will end up losing many of their followers over time.

If someone really wants to gain many followers for traffic they must sacrifice the intimacy of having only a small amount of people to follow.

I follow over 9,000 and have no problem catching much of what they say and communicating with them over time.

The Lists feature is very helpful in this way too, as well as using Tweet Deck and Tweetvisor to manage and keep track of RTs and mentions.

Here&#039;s an interesting example of all this:
http://twitter.com/FollowBackRules

Happy Tweeting!

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There of course is no obligation to follow someone back.  However, if someone wants traffic from twitter they have to get more and more followers.  But if they aren&#8217;t already famous, or a major brand, or an exceptionally interesting and original tweeter, they will probably never get to KEEP all their followers that they do get.</p>
<p>This is because once someone is following 2,001 they can&#8217;t follow any more until they&#8217;re being followed by at least only 10% less followers.</p>
<p>For example, someone being followed by 2,000 can not follow more than 2,200.  So, as most people reach the 2,001 following limit they are usually being followed by less so they have to unfollow people in order to follow new people, this includes following back their new followers. </p>
<p>So, unless a certain Tweeter is famous or especially interesting, they will end up losing many of their followers over time.</p>
<p>If someone really wants to gain many followers for traffic they must sacrifice the intimacy of having only a small amount of people to follow.</p>
<p>I follow over 9,000 and have no problem catching much of what they say and communicating with them over time.</p>
<p>The Lists feature is very helpful in this way too, as well as using Tweet Deck and Tweetvisor to manage and keep track of RTs and mentions.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting example of all this:<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/FollowBackRules" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/FollowBackRules</a></p>
<p>Happy Tweeting!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.twitip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-74069</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-74069</guid>
		<description>Most of the time I twitter on a desktop app and do not see follower lists. My follow/follower lists are fairly small. Occasionally when on the Twitter site I will check lists if the count shows a follower increase. I do not automatically follow followers. Only after looking at their timeline. If interesting, OK, if spammy, block, if indeterminate, let it lay, no harm. Someone bent because they were not followed is someone to ignor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the time I twitter on a desktop app and do not see follower lists. My follow/follower lists are fairly small. Occasionally when on the Twitter site I will check lists if the count shows a follower increase. I do not automatically follow followers. Only after looking at their timeline. If interesting, OK, if spammy, block, if indeterminate, let it lay, no harm. Someone bent because they were not followed is someone to ignor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Lim</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-73080</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-73080</guid>
		<description>I think the analogy of dating can be brought here.  Is a woman obligated to do anything for a man if he takes her out to dinner, a movie, dancing, whatever?  Of course not.  But is the woman responsible for making it clear, that, after a date, or a couple of them, she is not interested, and would not like to go on any more dates?  Of course.  

My point is, that there&#039;s a sort of etiquette there.  There&#039;s an unspoken reciprocity of civility.  I think there&#039;s a similar one on Twitter as well.

Should he have expected you to follow?  NO.  But I only say that because he initiated most of the conversation and emailed you.  But if you asked for more information from him and engaged him further, I think, then, that you should follow him.  

But just like in the dating analogy, there are those that are going to expect things because they themselves initiated.  And there are also those that refuse to reciprocate in kind, while showing interest, engaging and accepting.

I think there&#039;s fine line here somewhere.  I think we&#039;re all just trying to figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the analogy of dating can be brought here.  Is a woman obligated to do anything for a man if he takes her out to dinner, a movie, dancing, whatever?  Of course not.  But is the woman responsible for making it clear, that, after a date, or a couple of them, she is not interested, and would not like to go on any more dates?  Of course.  </p>
<p>My point is, that there&#8217;s a sort of etiquette there.  There&#8217;s an unspoken reciprocity of civility.  I think there&#8217;s a similar one on Twitter as well.</p>
<p>Should he have expected you to follow?  NO.  But I only say that because he initiated most of the conversation and emailed you.  But if you asked for more information from him and engaged him further, I think, then, that you should follow him.  </p>
<p>But just like in the dating analogy, there are those that are going to expect things because they themselves initiated.  And there are also those that refuse to reciprocate in kind, while showing interest, engaging and accepting.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s fine line here somewhere.  I think we&#8217;re all just trying to figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-73065</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-73065</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true that I only follow a few people (34 right now).  It&#039;s not that I am an elitist (at least I don&#039;t think so) but I don&#039;t want to be over run with noise.  So I only follow those I am interested in.  

I did check out Tom&#039;s tweets and just was not interested in numerous tweets each day.  It would have added a ton of noise to my tweet feed.

I have only found 34 people worth following right now.  As time goes on it will probably increase.   And only I can decide who is worth following.  It&#039;s like real life.  You don&#039;t have to be friends with everyone.  Maybe that makes me an elitist.

I much prefer to interact with people via email.  Email gives me less noise and more characters.  

I actually list my email address on my twitter account (it&#039;s part of my background).  BTW, if you have any traffic questions feel free to email me and I will help you out NicksTrafficTricks at gmail.com

I want to use Twitter to network but I don&#039;t want to be over run with too much noise.    I thank everyone who RT&#039;s my stuff and answer peoples&#039; questions.  But I may not follow them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that I only follow a few people (34 right now).  It&#8217;s not that I am an elitist (at least I don&#8217;t think so) but I don&#8217;t want to be over run with noise.  So I only follow those I am interested in.  </p>
<p>I did check out Tom&#8217;s tweets and just was not interested in numerous tweets each day.  It would have added a ton of noise to my tweet feed.</p>
<p>I have only found 34 people worth following right now.  As time goes on it will probably increase.   And only I can decide who is worth following.  It&#8217;s like real life.  You don&#8217;t have to be friends with everyone.  Maybe that makes me an elitist.</p>
<p>I much prefer to interact with people via email.  Email gives me less noise and more characters.  </p>
<p>I actually list my email address on my twitter account (it&#8217;s part of my background).  BTW, if you have any traffic questions feel free to email me and I will help you out NicksTrafficTricks at gmail.com</p>
<p>I want to use Twitter to network but I don&#8217;t want to be over run with too much noise.    I thank everyone who RT&#8217;s my stuff and answer peoples&#8217; questions.  But I may not follow them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-72997</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-72997</guid>
		<description>Very interesting thread indeed.  I am fairly new on Twitter, trying to learn the social aspect for relationship building as well as the powerful marketing potential that it brings.  I can easily see how people can become overwhelmed by following everyone, especially when some are tweeting similar content every 2 minutes.  

Learning to use the lists feature has helped me immensely to sort out the &quot;noise&quot; from the quality tweets that I am most interested in (and I don&#039;t even have that many followers yet!).  By keeping my lists private, I eliminate the possibility of offending anyone by being (or not being) on a certain list.  I can go right to a specific list and read the tweets I&#039;m interested in very quickly.  

As for being obligated to follow someone, many of the people here are right that there are no rules on Twitter (for who to follow) and you can use your account any way you want, however good etiquette would have you following most people who are open to a friendship or any exchange of ideas or information.  Isn&#039;t that why we&#039;re here? 

It&#039;s just like in the offline world, there&#039;s no rule that says you have to listen to someone who took the time to listen to you, but proper etiquette would be to allow them to speak as well.  It&#039;s called a conversation.  In fact, I don&#039;t think I would have as many friends if I wasn&#039;t a good listener.   

My choice is to keep the &quot;social&quot; in social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting thread indeed.  I am fairly new on Twitter, trying to learn the social aspect for relationship building as well as the powerful marketing potential that it brings.  I can easily see how people can become overwhelmed by following everyone, especially when some are tweeting similar content every 2 minutes.  </p>
<p>Learning to use the lists feature has helped me immensely to sort out the &#8220;noise&#8221; from the quality tweets that I am most interested in (and I don&#8217;t even have that many followers yet!).  By keeping my lists private, I eliminate the possibility of offending anyone by being (or not being) on a certain list.  I can go right to a specific list and read the tweets I&#8217;m interested in very quickly.  </p>
<p>As for being obligated to follow someone, many of the people here are right that there are no rules on Twitter (for who to follow) and you can use your account any way you want, however good etiquette would have you following most people who are open to a friendship or any exchange of ideas or information.  Isn&#8217;t that why we&#8217;re here? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just like in the offline world, there&#8217;s no rule that says you have to listen to someone who took the time to listen to you, but proper etiquette would be to allow them to speak as well.  It&#8217;s called a conversation.  In fact, I don&#8217;t think I would have as many friends if I wasn&#8217;t a good listener.   </p>
<p>My choice is to keep the &#8220;social&#8221; in social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude Stepaniak</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-72990</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude Stepaniak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-72990</guid>
		<description>Just say your sorry and follow me... and I will take back my comments.

Love,

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just say your sorry and follow me&#8230; and I will take back my comments.</p>
<p>Love,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Tiessen</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-72978</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Tiessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-72978</guid>
		<description>I am thoroughly  enjoying  this thread. I am a student of the &quot;Internet&quot; as an entity and its cultural, historical  and philosophical significance. I believe because of the importance we assign our own Internet presence it can seem an attack on our self worth and esteem to not be followed especially by someone we feel we have been a good &quot;friend&quot; to by RT and referencing etc. These things can be perceived as personal attacks, as if they work with you and when you pass in the hall or at the water cooler they say hi and you ignore them. There was obviously a more mature way to have handled the perceived slight, but people&#039;s web identities are becoming extensions of &quot;real&quot; life. All very good insights people and great additions to my research and book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thoroughly  enjoying  this thread. I am a student of the &#8220;Internet&#8221; as an entity and its cultural, historical  and philosophical significance. I believe because of the importance we assign our own Internet presence it can seem an attack on our self worth and esteem to not be followed especially by someone we feel we have been a good &#8220;friend&#8221; to by RT and referencing etc. These things can be perceived as personal attacks, as if they work with you and when you pass in the hall or at the water cooler they say hi and you ignore them. There was obviously a more mature way to have handled the perceived slight, but people&#8217;s web identities are becoming extensions of &#8220;real&#8221; life. All very good insights people and great additions to my research and book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaMarie Dias</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-72973</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaMarie Dias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-72973</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with Shelly.  And while you are certainly not obligated to follow-back, I definitely think that there are more than 20 people on Twitter posting interesting comments and content.  There are over 20 right here that have taken the time to engae in this conversation and add valuable insights. 

That said, I do vette each person before I follow them and if, upon visiting their tweet stream, I saw a post like the one Tom posted to you, I would certainly not follow them. That type of comment is, in my opinion unecessary and unkind. 

I often say Who You Follow + Who Follows You = Your Twitter Experience  My experience has really been quite positive and productive and I am truly enjoying it. Being careful and cognizant about who you follow truly helps ensure a good experience.

Thank you for starting this interesting conversation!

Have a great day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with Shelly.  And while you are certainly not obligated to follow-back, I definitely think that there are more than 20 people on Twitter posting interesting comments and content.  There are over 20 right here that have taken the time to engae in this conversation and add valuable insights. </p>
<p>That said, I do vette each person before I follow them and if, upon visiting their tweet stream, I saw a post like the one Tom posted to you, I would certainly not follow them. That type of comment is, in my opinion unecessary and unkind. </p>
<p>I often say Who You Follow + Who Follows You = Your Twitter Experience  My experience has really been quite positive and productive and I am truly enjoying it. Being careful and cognizant about who you follow truly helps ensure a good experience.</p>
<p>Thank you for starting this interesting conversation!</p>
<p>Have a great day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot Duke</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/are-you-obligated-to-follow-back/#comment-72972</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2950#comment-72972</guid>
		<description>No, you are not obligated to follow back.  Just follow the people who offer true value..my survey shows that over 80% of the tweets posted are for lame quotes from famous people and just a link to some promotional item.  This offers no value to anyone outside the person who posted it and they run close to a 85% chance of getting blocked.  So choose who you follow wisely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you are not obligated to follow back.  Just follow the people who offer true value..my survey shows that over 80% of the tweets posted are for lame quotes from famous people and just a link to some promotional item.  This offers no value to anyone outside the person who posted it and they run close to a 85% chance of getting blocked.  So choose who you follow wisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

