Do You Automatically Follow Everyone Who Follows You? [POLL]

Everyone seems to have their own criteria for working out who they will follow on Twitter.

Some follow everyone they can, others wait to be followed before they follow others, some are very selective and only follow those that they personally know, others try to keep those that they follow to a certain focused niche….

Quite a few Twitter users seem to follow anyone who follows them. This poll is simply to identify how common this practice is.

Do You Automatically Follow Anyone Who Follows You?

Loading ... Loading ...

Feel free to comment below on why you answered as you did and to share what criteria you use to determine who you follow on Twitter.

Comments

  • November 24, 2008

    I prefer the manual approach, as it saves me from following spammy and irrelevant profiles.

  • November 24, 2008

    Of course not :)

  • November 24, 2008

    Manual also works best for me.
    Blindly following every follower will incentivize spammers to follow as many people as possible.

  • November 24, 2008

    I check my email for new follow notifications and check out their profiles. I will follow if I like their bios and last tweets.

  • November 24, 2008

    I like to choose myself. I often choose new folks to follow based on conversations they are having with those I already follow.

    If someone follows me and their page has… Updated my blog… updated my blog Every day then NO I don’t follow.

    If someone follows me that lives in CO I usually follow… figure they might know something local going on that I don’t want to miss out on.

    That’s how I roll! ;)

  • November 24, 2008

    I spend a few minutes reviewing their activity and tweets to see the level of personal interaction with others.

    I do check out their blog or website prior to deciding if I will follow or not, since I’m not at all interested in celebrity gossip and such, but I do visit their site to see if I am interested at all in possibly subscribing.

  • November 24, 2008

    For a while I was following back everyone who followed–until I started following something like 80 people. I go one Twitter about twice a day. I’m not an addict. At 80 people, I can’t get through all the tweets when I go on twice a day, so now I’m a lot more selective. I look at their profile (are we in a similar business? do we have anything in common?) and their tweets (can I learn from this person? are they tweeting things that I can’t stand reading?) and then I decide. I’d say about half the time I decided to follow back and about half the time, I don’t.

  • November 24, 2008

    I prefer to be selective, although I sometimes go back after a while to see whether someone I chose not to follow has suddenly given me a reason to follow based on the tweets they’re tweeting.

  • November 24, 2008

    I always review activity of people following me, if they are worth of my interest, I star following them – otherwise, there is no point…

  • November 24, 2008

    +1 What everyone else already said. Sometimes those with legitimate accounts talk about nothing of interest and just wouldn’t be worth following.

  • November 24, 2008

    Like the others, I will review a page or two of their comments to see if they have said anything interesting, or if they’re interacting with others. I also look to see if they’re following anyone I know. Perhaps they have a mutual interest that’s not apparent by their most recent tweets.

  • November 24, 2008

    I usually check every follower of mine and see if he is worth following.
    Most of the followers these days are just spammers who follow thousands of members at a time and tweet a few times about their sites.

  • November 24, 2008

    The only reason I won’t follow someone back is if they’re all spam and no community interaction or they don’t have their profile information/picture filled out. I’m not going to follow someone who’s completely anonymous (isn’t that the point of community? Having an identity and participating?) and I really don’t need to see an advertisement an hour about the same thing. Otherwise, I’ll follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    As with most, it depends on what their feed looks like. If it’s all “thanks for the follow” or “check out the new post on my blog”, I don’t. I figure anyone who’s anyone doesn’t thank everyone for following them. That’s just silly. It’s not like they’re doing you a favor unless you’re just trying to collect followers.

  • November 24, 2008

    I always try to keep up with all the tweets from my friends. This means I can’t follow more than around 50 people, so obviously I can’t add everybody who befriends me. But if somebody has a lot of interesting content, or appears to be a cool person in general, I usually give him/her a chance :)

  • November 24, 2008

    I tend to follow only those I have something in common with. I take a look at the prospective follows website and watch their tweets for a bit before deciding to follow. Otherwise there is just too much noise and too much spam.

    Great blog, thank you for all the wonderful twitips! :)

  • November 24, 2008

    I like to check out the activities, interests, geographical location and conversation of a person before I consider them worth pursuing further discussion/listening. Or if they are a funny cat! Otherwise, it’s often a waste of perfectly good time.

  • November 24, 2008

    Darren – I just opened another Twitter ID where I WOULD like to follow everyone who follows it.

    @winetxt

    How do I set that up?

    Love how practical and helpful everything you do is!

    Richard

  • November 24, 2008

    Absolutely not. There’s only so much about social media and travel deals I can read. Add that to the fact that so many people are just adding people indiscriminately to try to boost their follower numbers and it’s just pointless. My follow and follower numbers stay fairly close. How can anyone get value out of following 2,000 people? How can you even stay abreast of all that information? It reminds me of the popularity contests on MySpace and Facebook – who can have the most “friends.”

  • November 24, 2008

    I wait for them to follow me and if they have interesting profiles and tweets I will return the follow :)

  • November 24, 2008

    I will follow everyone who follows me once I reviewed their Twitter updates history.

  • November 24, 2008

    I prefer doing it manually because I would want discussions only that are relevant to me.

  • November 24, 2008

    I’m a manual follower. I’ll take a look at their page to see what they tweet about, then I visit their blog and read their twitter account description. I’ve discovered some great resources and people by following those in different professions.

  • November 24, 2008

    I don’t always follow those that follow me. But I like to check out their sites and if I can relate or just like their sites, I like to follow and find out more about them.

    I’m not totally biz-centric on Twitter and I’ll tweet about a variety of things. I like the variety of Twitter. I’ve learned alot (biz & otherwise) from people that I have followed.

    Twitter IS Kool! ;-)

  • November 24, 2008

    I don’t automatically follow people who follow me on my personal Twitter ID. I review tweets and try to stick with my niche. or actually niches…

    I go back and forth on whether to automatically follow for corporate accounts I manage. I notice a lot of corporations do use auto follow..wish you had asked this second question, Darren…should businesses auto follow?

  • November 24, 2008

    When I have new followers, I always look at their Twitter page first then their websites. If I like their tweets, then I follow them. If I can’t relate to their tweets or find anything useful in their tweets, I don’t follow them.

    If I like their websites and find it interesting enough, I also follow them. Sometimes Twitter works like my feed reader (which I sometimes forget to check) in that it updates me when someone has a new post.

  • November 24, 2008

    I check out their profile, and blog or website if they have linked to one, to see if we are likely to have anything in common. I do follow most people though. The only people I have ignored have been really spammy, or a bit weird.

  • November 24, 2008

    I voted no as in I do not have a system to automatically follows those that follow me. I manually follow everyone who follows me.

  • November 24, 2008

    I do it manually too and no I don’t follow everyone that follows me. I look for those that I might have a connection with, those that are in my niche and those that I would be happy to learn from.

  • November 24, 2008

    For the most part, I choose to follow people who have something to say besides: “Buy this,” or “Check out this website.” I want to connect with people, not web sites or products.

    If your updates tell me who you are, make me think, touch my heart or make me laugh, I am likely to follow you. If you are strictly marketing, and not injecting yourself into your conversations, I’m not interested.

    I am insatiably curious, so I like following a variety of people. It means I can’t always be on top of everybody’s updates, but it makes for interesting reading when I do sign on.

  • November 24, 2008

    with all the spammer’s and bots around at the moment, I prefer to choose myself.

  • November 24, 2008

    I don’t automatically follow everyone, but I’ve considered it to be polite, however, I don’t have that many followers, so it’s not a big hassle, and I notice that some of my follows are bots/spammish, so I wouldn’t follow them anyways.

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow back *most* people but don’t follow when they have a stream of the same link or are only doing automatic posts from their blog. If I don’t follow someone, I’ll check them out in a week or two when I clean things up. If they are getting the hang of Twitter and contributing then I’ll follow them back.

  • November 24, 2008

    I would like to follow everyone but I can’t justify having too many tweets each day with content that I’m not interested in. I’ll usually look at the person’s twitter content before deciding, not automatically.

  • November 24, 2008

    I try to follow everyone that follows me… but if we have no shared interests or they seem to using it purely to advertise things I am not interested in… then I don’t

  • November 24, 2008

    I refollow who follows me when they arouse my interest, otherwise i don’t.

  • November 24, 2008

    I think this Poll will be a little skewed. If you’re reading Twitter Tips by Darren Rowse, you’re probably a blogger or business owner. By default, we bloggers and business owners focus on value, so we would be less likely to follow everyone who follows us.

    However, Twitter isn’t just for business owners. It has regular people talking about regular things. These people include, the Myspace Friend Addicts who added anyone and everyone as a friend to brag about their friend count. You probably remember this frenzy a few years ago…

    So, depending on what demographic you’re speaking to, the answer to this poll is likely to change.

    What do you think?

  • November 24, 2008

    No, at the moment, I intentionally manually follow back only after checking four things:
    (1) what’s in their profile? does it list a real website (and not just a sales copy page); do they list the state they’re from, and/or do they have a thoughtful description;
    (2) is their latest page (or two) of Tweets interesting to me ?
    (3) is their Followers to Following ratio overly skewed? (do they only have a few followers yet they follow close to the 2,000 max limit); and
    (4) have they Tweeted recently? (at least once within the latest week).
    It’s actually a rather quick process to know if it’s someone of interest to me or not.

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow people if they don’t seem like spammers, or if they seem to be related to my niche. Sometimes, I forget to follow back, however. Oops

    However, I do check if their site seems legit, and how often they tweet. If it is only blog updates, and nothing else, I tend not to follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    I don’t automatically follow people who follow me for precisely the same reasons as those stated above. That goes for all online services I use.

  • November 24, 2008

    I’m all about careful screening. These days, twitter usernames themselves are often a dead giveaway for spam. Nonetheless I will always check out their bio, website and/or recent tweets to gauge whether I want to follow.

    Biggest pet peeves: People with no bio, or bio that tells me exactly nothing about who they are and what they do. Cutesy, ambiguous phrases = no follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    I don’t automatically follow people who follow me. I tend to follow two criteria:
    1. I follow those that seem to be mostly tweeting about a subject that interests me, hence I follow a lot of other TV bloggers.
    2. I follow some of the followers that follow me and then @ me with comments about what I’ve tweeted or answer questions that I’ve posed, etc.

  • November 24, 2008

    I have actually waffled on this one. For a while, I was following everyone who followed me, to a point where I signed up for a service to do the auto-follow. After getting annoyed by spam tweets, I have since unsub’ed from the service and have gone back to the manual method.

    By doing it manually, I get a chance to screen, but also send out a DM thanking the person for the follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    I will follow back people I think look interesting to me, and who I think I can enter in some kind of relevant conversation with me in Twitter terms. I don’t follow back people who clearly have nothing in common with me. I rarely un-follow, if I do so it’s because someone is being a douche :)

  • November 24, 2008

    too many spam followers out there – I always manually check – as long as I see some historical tweets between them and other people i know/follow I will follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    I agree with the @Helen approach on this one. I’m very interested in hearing why folks would answer this question as “yes.” To me, that seems like you are missing the point of twitter. Wait…there is a point of twitter? Just playing….

    dj

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow for a bit, but if someone is spending the day tweeting about their temperature of their coffee and what they’re eating for lunch — without anything else — I usually stop following. I like the personal stuff, but not if that’s all there is. I like to get — and give — good information.

    I will also “unfollow” someone if I reply to them, or ask them a question directly and they do not answer. Did it last night.

    It was actually a liberating experience!

  • November 24, 2008

    About 80%, but too many spammers or those that haven’t learned yet that Twitter is not a blatant advertising site to automatically approve.

    Jeff

  • November 24, 2008

    Right now I am new, so I usually add them automatically, after I’ve read their page. So far I haven’t seen anything I hate or too spammy. I have done searches looking for people in my niche though, and followed them, to start.

    I agree with @mcmilker though – “wish you had asked this second question, Darren… should businesses auto follow?”

  • November 24, 2008

    I’m not so worried about having big ‘follow’ numbers, so NO, I don’t automatically follow anyone who follows me. Like many, first I check out their Tweets, read their bio, and if they’ve expressed an interest in something I’m interested, I’ll give them a go. If I find their tweets annoying or too boring – I’ve got no qualms about un-following them. Twitter is entertainment for me, life’s too short for senseless tweets!

  • November 24, 2008

    Manual follow.

    When I recieve the notify-email, I will check out their twitter page for no-goes like stupid selfmarketing, spam-twitters or just nothing interesting. Otherwise I am happy to follow people all around the world :D

  • November 24, 2008

    Generally speaking I mostly follow those who follow me, it’s only fair. There are occasions when I don’t follow them, like when it’s obvious that they’re just advertising things. I would have voted in this poll, but you haven’t included a “mostly” option!

  • November 24, 2008

    I’m selective, in that I check out people who choose to follow me before deciding whether to follow back. I don’t understand how people who follow hundreds of other folk can make any sense of the resulting flood. I find that following just a few dozen people gives me more than enough to cope with!

  • November 24, 2008
    Dan Thornton
    @badgergravling

    Funnily enough, I was just writing a post for 140char when this appeared in Google Reader, and my topic was on the fact I’m not reciprocating follows because people don’t supply any information about who they are or what they do for me to make a judgement on.

    Particularly frustrating are people with protected updates who follow me – how on earth am I meant to guess whether or not to request to follow them. I could automatically respond, and then remove them later if they’re not of interest, but it turns into more work than I’d like!

    I basically follow Helen’s rules, posted above, in general…

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow pretty much everyone who follows me. But I unfollow if they turn out to be uninteresting/obnoxious.

  • November 24, 2008

    I’m all about following people who add value to my twitter time. If I get a mention or two, I might go check out their profile. I’m suffering from information overload as it is!

  • November 24, 2008

    In the beginning of my twitter-life, I did. I followed everyone that followed me. Since then my twittter-verse has developed. I now review what there activities are like, see if we have common followers/friends. See why they are on twitter, and so on.
    I think there is such a thing as following too many.

  • November 24, 2008

    When the email comes in that I’m being followed, I check the bio and website. It’s usually easy to see who is just trying to sell me something. And what’s with those “I’m playing with my FREE laptop” deals?

  • November 24, 2008

    To follow or not to follow…followers? I use the rear view mirror method. I take the time to see who is following, if they update and thus participate, if what they tweet or blog is of interest and frankly if they are a real and authentic human tweet and not a corporate pr/ad machine. Yes, I look at profile, websites, twitter content, frequency of updates and then read between the lines to see if this stranger following my “what I am doing” conversation does more than just lurk or just sell. I look to see if they for real, honest, friendly and perhaps working to make a difference with social media and hopefully have a sense of humor. Like anything else in life, to follow or not to follow followers is a choice. Thank you Twitter for the option.

  • November 24, 2008

    No, But I do always thank them for following me. I also automatically follow people who post keywords that interest me, such as marketing, new media, advertising, seovice and so on…

    I talk about this in Episode 16 of SeoVice: TOP 5 TWITTER TIPS.
    http://www.seovice.com

  • November 24, 2008

    Back in the day maybe, but since ‘Bill the Blogger is now following you’ became common place in my inbox this changed.

  • November 24, 2008

    While I don’t auto follow everyone who follows me, I do at least auto-send a direct message back to them thanking them for following me by using Tweetlater. It’s a nice tool for getting in touch with fellow Tweeters. I always insist on checking out followers first before following them.

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow if there is a shared interest or the follower seems particularly interesting or even if it’s obvious that the follower isn’t spamming. There are too many spammers to just follow everyone, though.

  • November 24, 2008

    Oh, I probably committed a Mortal Sin with Twitter. If I couldn’t figure out why people were Following me, I’d Block them.

    Then I discovered Qwitter, which showed me such people will leave without such, uh, encouragement.

    I don’t auto Follow back. People have to have something in their tweets that interests me for my blog or be generally interesting.

    I still Block: But only those accounts that have already been Suspended by Twitter. This keep my Follower count honest.

  • November 24, 2008

    I usually manually follow those who are following me. When after viewing their tweets for awhile I find a pattern of content that’s either boring or unacceptable I stop following them. Right now it’s not a problem to follow everyone because not many people are following me.

  • November 24, 2008

    I generally watch who people I already follow are conversing with. If the convo seems relevant to what I’m interested in, I’ll dig deeper. Also, when I’m notified of new followers, I’ll dig deeper. Here’s my “workflow,” you could call it, for choosing followers and it goes relatively quickly:

    1. Check the Follow vs. Follower ratio–these numbers can automatically give you a feel for how they use twitter. If they’re following only a handful of people with a ton of followers, it generally shows that they’re only there to post–not to converse (not always a bad thing though). If they follow a ton, with only a handful of followers, chances are they’re spamming. I’ve found a good balance is when they follow a good number of people, but a smaller number than are following them; it’s a good indication that their tweets are worthwhile and they know how to join the conversation.

    2. What’s their sidebar say they do? People tend to tweet about what they know or love, and it’s those topics that I’m looking for, such as graphic/web design stuff. If I don’t like what I see on step 1 or 2, I’ll throw in the towel.

    3. General scan of their tweets. Is it mostly personal stuff? Do they share a lot of links? Are they replying or retweeting often? Is it all self-promotion, or “I could use a Digg or StumbleUpon” requests? (Personally, if it’s worth the diggs or stumbles, then you won’t have to ask people to do it).

    4. Finally, I’ll check out the link to their website to get a better feel of who they are and what they do.

  • November 24, 2008

    I’ll check out the profile of anyone who decides to follow me. If they share similar interests and regularly Twitter in an interesting way, then I’ll probably follow them.

  • November 24, 2008

    There was just a huge conversation about this on a blog site yesterday. The conversation initially was about the Gurus not following all who follow them. The owner twittered the fact that things had gotten personal. It was interesting to see the responses as there appears to be no middle ground with this and people were VERY passionate in their responses.

    I clicked “Yes” to the poll, but that’s not entirely accurate. If they are obviously just a business marketing twitterer then most likely I will not return the follow, especially if their ratios are too out of whack.

    Cheers

    George

  • November 24, 2008

    I generally only add people I know, which means people I physically know in real life, people whose blog I read, or people I’ve met randomly online via Plurk, Facebook, Diigo, etc. I’ve also added some news tweets (NYT, CNN, MarchOf Dimes), so the stream I have to read over is pretty full. I wish I could separate news and personal tweets. Ah, this is what I want: The ability to categorize the people I’m following, and then view them by category. I would definitely follow more people if I had this option.

  • November 24, 2008

    Even though I enjoy people following me, that doesn’t mean I have to follow them aswell.

    The only people I follow are people that link out to valuable places and people I can learn from.

  • November 24, 2008

    Not only do I carefully choose which new followers to follow back, and block spammy followers, I also unfollow folks who tweet too many replies that mean nothing to anyone but the @ recipient. Come on folks, either make it relevant to many, or use the D function!

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow people by hand because I want to follow people that talk about things that I find interesting. If I just added everyone that added me, then I’d be following people that don’t talk about things I’m interested in, and the value of Twitter would decrease for me. By manually following, Twitter stays valuable, and I’m more inclined to continue actively using it.

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow most people who follow me. Often this is because they have worthwhile content. Sometimes this is out of courtesy. If they twit too much they have to have exceptional content or I’ll stop following.

  • November 24, 2008

    I return the favor of following unless the new follower is a spammer.

  • November 24, 2008

    I usually look to see what sort of thing they are twittering about and how often they twitter. I don;t want to follow people who are only using twitter to self promote or tweet 16 times an hour about nothing interesting.

  • November 24, 2008

    I definitely look at a person’s most recent tweets before choosing to follow them – if all of their posts are about sports or if I think they’re just trying to sell me something, I don’t follow them. I think it’s important to keep the dialogue relevant.

  • November 24, 2008

    I don’t automatically follow everyone. But as long as it isn’t a brand new account I generally follow them back. My pet peeve is following someone then them not following you back. But that is ok because if they don’t follow me back in a few days I stop following them.

    I guess I really don’t use Twitter enough to know the ins and outs but if I follow someone and they do not follow me. Then I make a reply to them will they actually see it?

  • November 24, 2008

    I am very selected. I usually won’t follow people who are following more than 100 others as I think that is too many to have a meaningful conversation with. I also won’t follow anyone who’s last 5 posts are pimping their own blog posts, who have less than a page of content, or who haven’t written anything that seems relevant to me.

    I am much more likely to follow people that are local to me.

  • November 24, 2008

    I check out their tweets first. To avoid spam. But generally, following the tips I ave seen I follow those who follow me.

  • November 24, 2008

    Just ditto-ing Helen above. That’s about the system I follow, although I only check about once a week and look at all new followers at the same time. That has the effect of giving those who are just following me to get me to follow them time to go away.

    I find I’m much more likely to follow people that I have sought out than ever anyone who follows me first. (Unless I know them and that’s how I discover they’re on Twitter at all.) I regularly conduct searches on topics I care about, looking for new people to follow who are talking about what I want to know. I don’t find much value in taking a passive approach in who to follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    My system is much like Karsten’s. When I get the notification email I check the person’s profile, last tweets, and their website if they have one. But as long as there isn’t an empty profile or the person isn’t a spammer or bot I will almost always follow back. I used to me more selective but I’ve found that I was missing out on a lot of interesting people. They might not have the same interests but I’m learning from almost all of them.

  • November 24, 2008

    Hi!
    I refollow the Peeps who follows me ..
    for both interests ;)
    O no?
    ciao from italy

  • November 24, 2008

    I do on my branded, blog-related account, but not my personal account, where I greatly limit the number of people I follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    Although I voted yes, I do examine the account to make sure it’s not spammy.

    9 times out of ten, though, I do add the people who add me.

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow most people who follow me. Sometimes I won’t follow, but usually I will

  • November 24, 2008

    I like to see who they are and what the “represent”. Is that person active on Twitter, what are they writing about, what are their beliefs, etc. I want to see if I can build a relationship with that person.

  • November 24, 2008

    I tend to get followed by a lot of accounts that are purely just RSS bots, or are using Twitter as an attempt to promote their site rather as a community. For that reason, I tend to manually follow back people who follow me; but that said I still try to follow as many worthwhile people as I can.

  • November 24, 2008

    I initially follow nearly everyone who follows me after a quick review of their profile. If they seem legit, I follow back.

    I’m quick to unfollow though. If someone seems out of touch with what I like to talk about or just uninteresting, I unfollow. What I now HATE is qwitter. Next person who bitches about being unfollowed is getting a virtual throat punch. It’s not personal, I just don’t care to hear what you have to say.

    Well, maybe it is personal. I don’t get upset when people unfollow me.

  • November 24, 2008

    Like others say, I review their activity and blog. It it sounds interesting I will go ahead and follow them as well. Maybe there will be new interesting conversations I can follow/join.

    On the same token, that is the same reason I don’t believe everyone I follow should follow me back. Perhaps what they find interesting is different than what I do.

  • November 24, 2008

    I prefer to choose myself. I usually look to see what sort of thing they are twittering about.

  • November 24, 2008

    I look at their Twitter page to see what they tweet about. I follow their links to see if their content is relevant to me. If it is, I follow them.

  • November 24, 2008

    Well twitter is about popularity and following and Interaction. When someone with 20 followers follows me, I respect him as much as bigger follower like Joelcomm. People are all the same. I give him or her the same courtesy as they gave me.

    I donot follow Gurus and other one way hogs who do have 10K followers and are only following 300 others. That is a not my style.

  • November 24, 2008

    Most of the time I will check out a followers last page of posts and any attached weblinks. If there is too much personal stuff, like a minute by minute update on their life then I usually will not follow. I like to see a nice looking website that isn’t just about selling to me and somebody I can relate to or share information with. I also tend to avoid people following 2000 or more unless they have a Great ratio or exceptional first impressions.

  • November 24, 2008

    I definitely avoid the spammers, but I also check out the site that they link.

  • November 24, 2008

    I follow contributors to a biz/tech/web 2.0 conversation..not big on those who only tweet personal stuff or r obviously trying to win traffic to their latest blog/website update because u can’t find their blog/websitein the top 10 a G.com for a related search..I could care less, esp what they had for a meal etc, inspirational quotes are extremely annoying, only have to look at my calender to find those..if I needed them i.e. IMarketers who cross-promote one another’s launches are very annoying/waste of space IMHO. e.g. Stompernet2 promo/offering turned out to be a box full of discs full of 2006 info..all out of date, and much worse once I was inside…supported by the spam technique ‘article spinning’ to drive tacky IM squeeze pages into top searches because adwords burned them, and rightly so. To their credit they did refund my $$. Darren u r one of the exceptions..most posts offer value/edu/informative :)

  • November 24, 2008

    Sounds a bit snobby but I don’t follow everyone who follows me. I do check out the profile of those who do follow me to see who they are and what they do along with reading some of their Twitter messages.

    If I feel they have something to say in their Twitter messages, then I’ll follow them. But if they just post silly or non-informational messages, then I don’t.

    Wesley
    The Geek Entrepreneur

  • November 24, 2008

    No. It doesn’t seem personal when you auto follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    Not really,I rather not have a spammy twit acct.

  • November 24, 2008

    I did an experiment on this very issue, I found that less active memebers would follow whoever followed them. Also if their username declared themselves i.e sample @ilovefords and your name also related to that topic i.e sample @falconsrule they would also follow.

  • November 24, 2008

    I automatically refollow all legit twitter users but when companies/websites/spam refollow me I consider the value of the content before refollowing.

  • November 24, 2008

    I said “yes” but what I mean is: most of the time. I will follow business bloggers but only if their twitstreams have content other than “buy a time share http://www.cluelessspammer.com“. I’ll follow profiles with only one tweet if they live in my local area. My follow back rate is about 95%. I really hate it when other bloggers don’t follow back, particularly if I’ve commented on their blogs.

    To me, it’s like standing in the middle of a party with your hands over your ears. When the tweets get overwhelming I can always just check my @replys and DMs.

  • November 24, 2008

    On one of my first accounts @EcoBlogs I was following everyone who followed me, but there is no way to keep up with their tweets and a lot of them are just tweeting their blog posts with zero interaction (which is something I need to do more in all my accounts). I also added everyone locally I could find which now looking back was a bad thing, because I find myself wanting local people on yet another account, I don’t want to be following the same people on several accounts.

    On this account I only follow a few select people. I do checkout their profiles and will add any that I find relevant and not just tweeting blog posts.

  • November 25, 2008

    I follow the Twitters who post a link to articles and info. The rest of the posts I may skim but I’ve found alot resemble phone conversations: Taking the dog out for a walk, having a cup of coffee, etc.

  • November 25, 2008

    When someone adds me I check out their content and/or web site. If they look interesting I add them. They almost never look interesting. Most people I follow are either web designer or Montanans (or both).

  • November 25, 2008

    As a general rule, I do follow automatically. The good thing about not having too many followers yet, I implemented socialmediatoo.com scripts and then follow-up on every “Someone has followed” you e-mail sent by twitter, with reviewing their web site and the lasted 25 or so tweets. Although 5 million large Twitter user are early adopters and I can learn from everyone of them.

    Spammers are a danger as in any online community, the killed the Usernet as well as e-mail, and I have been using the “block user” feature available on Twitters web site three or four times.

    BTW: Darren Thank you so much for the TwitTip site and your probloggers insights. Always a great read!

  • November 25, 2008

    Hello Problogger!
    My experiment is successful!
    I follow the peeps who sayd : “I refollow….”
    And I have more 22 followers ;)
    ha!

  • November 25, 2008

    First I have a look at the profile and analyze to see the person isn’t just another spammer.

  • November 26, 2008

    Because I read in twitter it was a good idea lol

  • November 26, 2008

    Great question and it was a decision that took me two months to make. I was studying major players on twitter and noticing the difference between those that follow back and those that do not. Interesting to see that my choice is in the minority (mainly do to worries about spamming?) . For me it comes down to: do you want to interact or broadcast? I would also add that I rss feed an advance twitter search on keyword terms that helps me identify folks that have the potential to develop my network. This rss feed identifies approx. 50 folks a day that might prove valuable to my network. Approaching the platform from a volume standpoint has led to an increase in quality relationships. The move from 100 to 3500 followers has taken the number of important relationships from 10 to 200.

  • November 26, 2008

    I do not automatically follow everyone who follows me. However, if I like their bio, their blog/website or they have interesting tweets, I definitely follow them. But if their twitter account is full of just their blog posts, talking about their own company or doesn’t contain any updates, then they don’t get a follow back.

  • November 27, 2008

    No. I’d like to, but I also like to keep Twitter manageable, so that I can respond to others’ tweets. However, I’ve noticed that the way I use Twitter is changing, so that may change. :-)

  • November 27, 2008

    Absolutely not! If they are simply rss blog posters, and never conversing or replying to anyone, there is no point. There are times when I am on the fence, in which case I usually give them the benefit of the doubt, at least for a trial run!

  • November 29, 2008

    I’m one of the few yes’s. I autofollow for a couple of reasons:

    1) I’ve met some great people that I probably wouldn’t have followed if I had just looked at their profiles. When you follow people they tend to reach out, and I’ve made some good connections.

    2) The spam filtering on twitter has gotten quite good, especially since it’s user monitored.

    3. I primarily use tweedeck to monitor tweets, so it’s easy to filter out people that I don’t really read. :)

  • November 29, 2008

    Since I’m an artist, I prefer to follow other artists and crafters. I also tend to follow the tweets of bloggers that I’m already familiar with or twitters recommended by someone I know.

  • December 1, 2008

    I check out their *favorites*; if the stuff they are saving looks interesting, I’ll follow. Can I learn from them? Do we have things in common? Do I like what I see in their favorites?

  • December 3, 2008

    I follow people who I think might actually care about the things I say. If I go to a page and it is immediately obvious that they’re just hawking something, I’m out.

  • December 4, 2008

    what, no Lebowski freaks here? OK *cough* ‘i still jerk off manually’. but seriously, i’m following a bit over half those who follow me. as many have already said, i check profiles, bios, sites and their front-page twits. if i dig what i read, then i follow back.

  • December 30, 2008

    Thinking of setting up a Twitter account for my site on Apple & in particular the MacBook Air since it’s a popular machine. Not sure whether it’s worth the time investment for a site like mine as there is no point in twittering without a lot of followers!

    On my personal twitter accoutn I follow 20 industry orientated people. Personally, i prefer facebook status updates!

  • February 24, 2009

    For me its not an easy task to track all the do followers.
    Information Review

  • March 3, 2009

    I automatically follow whoever follows me, but then I’m pretty new to Twitter. At some point, I imagine I will pare the list of those who are not so attuned to where I want to go with information and such… Mostly the marketers. But for now, it’s just interesting to see what the world has to say, without limiting that world to my own preferences or expectations.

  • March 26, 2009

    I’m fairly new to Twitter and although it takes time to select who I follow back, I am in this for the long haul. I care more about quality than quantity.

  • May 29, 2010

    checking the sites of the people following you is a sign of courtesy! :)

  • August 14, 2010

    I agree with Amanda. The least you can do is check out there site. What can it hurt?

Add a comment