<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Streamlining Your Twitter Feed &#8211; Groups to the Rescue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/</link>
	<description>Twitter Tips in 140 Characters or More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hangen</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-36509</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hangen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-36509</guid>
		<description>Marcus, I agree...that is one of my main issues with TweetDeck and/or Seesmic...unfortunately I have not found a better option.

Julie, as long as you are using the same computer, your groups should remain when you log back in to TweetDeck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus, I agree&#8230;that is one of my main issues with TweetDeck and/or Seesmic&#8230;unfortunately I have not found a better option.</p>
<p>Julie, as long as you are using the same computer, your groups should remain when you log back in to TweetDeck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie M</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-36507</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-36507</guid>
		<description>This is great, but how do you bring the groups back up once you exit Tweetdeck and log back in??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great, but how do you bring the groups back up once you exit Tweetdeck and log back in??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Feder</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-34792</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Feder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-34792</guid>
		<description>Love the idea of grouping, but I read my Tweets on 4 different tweetdeck computers. It takes a long time to group, there should be a way to import/export groups from one to another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the idea of grouping, but I read my Tweets on 4 different tweetdeck computers. It takes a long time to group, there should be a way to import/export groups from one to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hangen</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-34177</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hangen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-34177</guid>
		<description>Bill - Never said not to follow everyone else, but if you try to keep everyone locked into a single feed then you will miss a lot of what&#039;s being said. This is just a technique you can use to filter the people you follow into different categories. Its a time saver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; Never said not to follow everyone else, but if you try to keep everyone locked into a single feed then you will miss a lot of what&#8217;s being said. This is just a technique you can use to filter the people you follow into different categories. Its a time saver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Greenberg - Good Computer Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-34146</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Greenberg - Good Computer Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-34146</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t get it.  Follow thousands of people, but really only look at your actual friends and a few others.  Then what&#039;s the point of following thousands of people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t get it.  Follow thousands of people, but really only look at your actual friends and a few others.  Then what&#8217;s the point of following thousands of people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector A.  Henry S.</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-33978</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector A.  Henry S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-33978</guid>
		<description>Thank for the mini tutorial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank for the mini tutorial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hangen</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-33769</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hangen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-33769</guid>
		<description>@jason - that would be a great feature, I&#039;ll take a look but I haven&#039;t found anything like that within TweetDeck. Not sure about Seesmic.

I can think of several ways I&#039;d implement it now, especially to get rid of news sites/people that I follow but that clog things up.

@brad - you should see a slider at the bottom of the screen that lets you scroll right and left within TweetDeck. You can edit group by clicking on the group name within that pane.

@christy - Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it. I really enjoy Twitter over Facebook, for a variety of reasons. The people are great and the interface much easier to use in my opinion. 

@Todd - I hadn&#039;t heard of that, but I will definitely check it out. Thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jason &#8211; that would be a great feature, I&#8217;ll take a look but I haven&#8217;t found anything like that within TweetDeck. Not sure about Seesmic.</p>
<p>I can think of several ways I&#8217;d implement it now, especially to get rid of news sites/people that I follow but that clog things up.</p>
<p>@brad &#8211; you should see a slider at the bottom of the screen that lets you scroll right and left within TweetDeck. You can edit group by clicking on the group name within that pane.</p>
<p>@christy &#8211; Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it. I really enjoy Twitter over Facebook, for a variety of reasons. The people are great and the interface much easier to use in my opinion. </p>
<p>@Todd &#8211; I hadn&#8217;t heard of that, but I will definitely check it out. Thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hangen</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-33731</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hangen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-33731</guid>
		<description>@Theresa - I agree that TweetDeck does consume a lot of space, but if you keep it up and   pop it open from time to time then you can still take advantage of it without using  your entire desktop. I&#039;m an exception, but I&#039;ve got a laptop set up just for TweetDeck.

@Chris - It is surprising to me as well. I haven&#039;t spent a lot of time with Seesmic, but I&#039;ve been working with a programmer to see if we can come up with something better. For now, I use TweetDeck and Twhirl, but I&#039;m always looking for something better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Theresa &#8211; I agree that TweetDeck does consume a lot of space, but if you keep it up and   pop it open from time to time then you can still take advantage of it without using  your entire desktop. I&#8217;m an exception, but I&#8217;ve got a laptop set up just for TweetDeck.</p>
<p>@Chris &#8211; It is surprising to me as well. I haven&#8217;t spent a lot of time with Seesmic, but I&#8217;ve been working with a programmer to see if we can come up with something better. For now, I use TweetDeck and Twhirl, but I&#8217;m always looking for something better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-33730</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-33730</guid>
		<description>@chris

I have been working with the Yahoo team to develop and test Sideline

http://sideline.yahoo.com

Sideline has groups, very powerful ones, more so than Tweetdeck. Sideline has no limits to the number of groups you can create ( Tweetdeck limited to 10? ) and you can create groups by people or keyword - critical for those concerned with brand management.  I find more utility in Sideline than Tweetdeck, but, obviously, I am bias. I encourage you all to try Sideline out and see it &quot;industrial strength&quot; for yourselves.

Also,

The same people that wrote Sidline ( @chadauld @tylerhall ) have been experimenting with &quot;influence&quot;. You can see the very alpha results here:

http://clickontyler.com/important-people/

If you find value in the influence algorithm, be sure to vote to add it to Sideline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chris</p>
<p>I have been working with the Yahoo team to develop and test Sideline</p>
<p><a href="http://sideline.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">http://sideline.yahoo.com</a></p>
<p>Sideline has groups, very powerful ones, more so than Tweetdeck. Sideline has no limits to the number of groups you can create ( Tweetdeck limited to 10? ) and you can create groups by people or keyword &#8211; critical for those concerned with brand management.  I find more utility in Sideline than Tweetdeck, but, obviously, I am bias. I encourage you all to try Sideline out and see it &#8220;industrial strength&#8221; for yourselves.</p>
<p>Also,</p>
<p>The same people that wrote Sidline ( @chadauld @tylerhall ) have been experimenting with &#8220;influence&#8221;. You can see the very alpha results here:</p>
<p><a href="http://clickontyler.com/important-people/" rel="nofollow">http://clickontyler.com/important-people/</a></p>
<p>If you find value in the influence algorithm, be sure to vote to add it to Sideline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Sharafinski</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/streamlining-your-twitter-feed-groups-to-the-rescue/#comment-33729</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Sharafinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=1741#comment-33729</guid>
		<description>Nathan and Darren-

GREAT blog post. What helpful tips and strategies! Already implemented...and now I&#039;m looking forward to really working with them.

As a &#039;neophyte&#039;, I really appreciate you sharing your thought process with all the tweets out there and how to work with them. It sometimes feels to me rather like people are just &#039;tweeting&#039; vs. connecting. For that reason, I&#039;ve preferred FB. But, from your comments, I&#039;m starting to understand how to build the relationships here more.

Thanks!
Christy Sharafinski
The Wrinkle Godmother</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan and Darren-</p>
<p>GREAT blog post. What helpful tips and strategies! Already implemented&#8230;and now I&#8217;m looking forward to really working with them.</p>
<p>As a &#8216;neophyte&#8217;, I really appreciate you sharing your thought process with all the tweets out there and how to work with them. It sometimes feels to me rather like people are just &#8216;tweeting&#8217; vs. connecting. For that reason, I&#8217;ve preferred FB. But, from your comments, I&#8217;m starting to understand how to build the relationships here more.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Christy Sharafinski<br />
The Wrinkle Godmother</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

