<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Schedule Tweets or No? Two Reasons You Should.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/</link>
	<description>Twitter Tips in 140 Characters or More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick London</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-97047</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-97047</guid>
		<description>I use a combination of scheduled tweets, promoting my stores, my wife&#039;s, close circle of friends, charities, and animal/nature causes. There is no way I could do it manually at one time, and, I&#039;d lose every follower, as the author said. My friends/followers may at times find the irritating, but my following continues to grow. I personally engage whenever I am at the computer. i NEVER send DM links or direct tweets to any particular Twitterer. That is spam. What I do is scheduled tweets; the same as Twitter does with their advertising program. I still get complaints, but those are usually from those who a. have no lives, b. tweet to themselves c. have decided they just don&#039;t like me (can&#039;t please everyone).  But I love my following and they seem to get along with me.  Oh, and I have used hootsuite, it was great for awhile until Twitter limited their output (now they charge for it) so we use Twaitter only. It does the trick.  Thanks, Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a combination of scheduled tweets, promoting my stores, my wife&#8217;s, close circle of friends, charities, and animal/nature causes. There is no way I could do it manually at one time, and, I&#8217;d lose every follower, as the author said. My friends/followers may at times find the irritating, but my following continues to grow. I personally engage whenever I am at the computer. i NEVER send DM links or direct tweets to any particular Twitterer. That is spam. What I do is scheduled tweets; the same as Twitter does with their advertising program. I still get complaints, but those are usually from those who a. have no lives, b. tweet to themselves c. have decided they just don&#8217;t like me (can&#8217;t please everyone).  But I love my following and they seem to get along with me.  Oh, and I have used hootsuite, it was great for awhile until Twitter limited their output (now they charge for it) so we use Twaitter only. It does the trick.  Thanks, Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-75210</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-75210</guid>
		<description>@Ross

I&#039;ve never said that you have to schedule tweets in order to create or even nurture these relationships. That&#039;s not the point at all. What I was addressing was the fact that it SEEMED that your position is one where folks have to be tied to Twitter all the time - because &quot;goodness forbid someone should be forced to wait 18 hours for their @you to be replied to *gasp*&quot;. 

Not everyone is on Twitter all.the.time - period. If you hold onto the belief system that you have to be there 100% of the time, you then are becoming not &quot;more social&quot; but more a slave to the platform.

Again, these points are NOT being made in support of scheduling (since, as I&#039;d stated last time, these are also considerations to be made for folks who don&#039;t schedule a single tweet) - it&#039;s more to do with the approach to twitter and the mindset around how black and white peoples viewpoints can be about it sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ross</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never said that you have to schedule tweets in order to create or even nurture these relationships. That&#8217;s not the point at all. What I was addressing was the fact that it SEEMED that your position is one where folks have to be tied to Twitter all the time &#8211; because &#8220;goodness forbid someone should be forced to wait 18 hours for their @you to be replied to *gasp*&#8221;. </p>
<p>Not everyone is on Twitter all.the.time &#8211; period. If you hold onto the belief system that you have to be there 100% of the time, you then are becoming not &#8220;more social&#8221; but more a slave to the platform.</p>
<p>Again, these points are NOT being made in support of scheduling (since, as I&#8217;d stated last time, these are also considerations to be made for folks who don&#8217;t schedule a single tweet) &#8211; it&#8217;s more to do with the approach to twitter and the mindset around how black and white peoples viewpoints can be about it sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-75187</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-75187</guid>
		<description>@Jan -- I&#039;ve read your comment twice but still don&#039;t see where you express the reasoning for calling my comment small minded. You make the claim but you don&#039;t really back it up. 

I have developed tons of relationships and made friends living everywhere from Australia to France  to Spain - You name it, I&#039;ve got it. I don&#039;t have to schedule my tweets to reach these people; I&#039;m a firm believer that if you&#039;re providing good content - they will find you.

Don&#039;t take the lazy way out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jan &#8212; I&#8217;ve read your comment twice but still don&#8217;t see where you express the reasoning for calling my comment small minded. You make the claim but you don&#8217;t really back it up. </p>
<p>I have developed tons of relationships and made friends living everywhere from Australia to France  to Spain &#8211; You name it, I&#8217;ve got it. I don&#8217;t have to schedule my tweets to reach these people; I&#8217;m a firm believer that if you&#8217;re providing good content &#8211; they will find you.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t take the lazy way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-75157</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-75157</guid>
		<description>@Ross

What I&#039;d touch on in replying has already been said basically (how actually, it&#039;s NOT taking away from the social component). But one thing in particular was noted. In response to &quot;Maybe tweet at them 18hrs later?&quot; That&#039;s soooooo small-minded. 

So what do you think, everyone on Twitter who would have a response to something you said is on EST or sitting in Sydney, or whatever timezone?

The reality is that Twitter is INTERNATIONAL, and if someone replies to you and you&#039;re sleeping at the time, well, so be it. And this scenario is true even for people with not a single automated tweet in their stream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ross</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d touch on in replying has already been said basically (how actually, it&#8217;s NOT taking away from the social component). But one thing in particular was noted. In response to &#8220;Maybe tweet at them 18hrs later?&#8221; That&#8217;s soooooo small-minded. </p>
<p>So what do you think, everyone on Twitter who would have a response to something you said is on EST or sitting in Sydney, or whatever timezone?</p>
<p>The reality is that Twitter is INTERNATIONAL, and if someone replies to you and you&#8217;re sleeping at the time, well, so be it. And this scenario is true even for people with not a single automated tweet in their stream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-74931</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-74931</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. I had been stuck with around 475 followers for a while and couldn&#039;t understand it. But then I realized that my tweets were way too close together and most people just weren&#039;t seeing value. So now I schedule a re-tweet of a great post every fifteen minutes (ending at Midnight and starting at 8 AM), three philosophy tweets every day, and of course still go onto the actual Twitter and socialize.

I use Hootsuite. I think it&#039;s definitely the best program.

After doing this for three days, my Twitter following has increased by sixty, which is more than I had gotten in the past month or so! Thanks, great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. I had been stuck with around 475 followers for a while and couldn&#8217;t understand it. But then I realized that my tweets were way too close together and most people just weren&#8217;t seeing value. So now I schedule a re-tweet of a great post every fifteen minutes (ending at Midnight and starting at 8 AM), three philosophy tweets every day, and of course still go onto the actual Twitter and socialize.</p>
<p>I use Hootsuite. I think it&#8217;s definitely the best program.</p>
<p>After doing this for three days, my Twitter following has increased by sixty, which is more than I had gotten in the past month or so! Thanks, great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-74564</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-74564</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I thought of something the other day which I wanted to add to this...

As mentioned earlier I don&#039;t have a problem with scheduled tweets however, sometimes such scheduled tweets come out when a major news item breaks (e.g. Chilean Earthquake) - in these cases it might be worth temporarily suspending scheduled tweets until the dust has settled. Otherwise you might look a little heartless and/or blinkered.

Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I thought of something the other day which I wanted to add to this&#8230;</p>
<p>As mentioned earlier I don&#8217;t have a problem with scheduled tweets however, sometimes such scheduled tweets come out when a major news item breaks (e.g. Chilean Earthquake) &#8211; in these cases it might be worth temporarily suspending scheduled tweets until the dust has settled. Otherwise you might look a little heartless and/or blinkered.</p>
<p>Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Koertge</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-74041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Koertge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-74041</guid>
		<description>On almost all projects I use a combination if live and scheduled tweets. If done cleverly, scheduling tweets can indeed help gain exposure during peak times and save enormous amounts of time.

I use tweetadder for some stuff, but usually stick to hootsuite for all the scheduled tweets. 

Has anyone heard if tweetdeck will begin allowing the scheduling of updates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On almost all projects I use a combination if live and scheduled tweets. If done cleverly, scheduling tweets can indeed help gain exposure during peak times and save enormous amounts of time.</p>
<p>I use tweetadder for some stuff, but usually stick to hootsuite for all the scheduled tweets. </p>
<p>Has anyone heard if tweetdeck will begin allowing the scheduling of updates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Sojourner</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-73962</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Sojourner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-73962</guid>
		<description>I think scheduling tweets is a very viable option.  The problem is when it is nothing but a spam tweet with a link to a business opportunity or sales page or something every time.  It&#039;s great to be visible but don&#039;t be a visible pain in the ass.  Give people some real, helpful or entertaining information.  Spare the spam...keep the follower!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think scheduling tweets is a very viable option.  The problem is when it is nothing but a spam tweet with a link to a business opportunity or sales page or something every time.  It&#8217;s great to be visible but don&#8217;t be a visible pain in the ass.  Give people some real, helpful or entertaining information.  Spare the spam&#8230;keep the follower!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-73854</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-73854</guid>
		<description>Hi Ross,
I get you. However, as you say &quot;and are rarely around to respond&quot;...I&#039;m always around to respond...Blackberry glued to my hand...if you don&#039;t believe me ask my wife :)

Let&#039;s look at it another way; if someone rings up a helpline and gets an answer phone, leaves a message, and then gets a prompt response the next day - then most people would be happy with that level of service. But it does depend on the context...if the message was &quot;we&#039;re on the shop, please call in...&quot; then poor show, if the message was &quot;Hey! we looking for your opinion on X&quot; then fine...like many things it depends on context.

Engagement &amp; interaction are defo key...but not necessarily immediate imho.

Saying that I don&#039;t  schedule tweets very often - like a specialist tool I use it when the occasion demands.

Nice chattin&#039; to you.

Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ross,<br />
I get you. However, as you say &#8220;and are rarely around to respond&#8221;&#8230;I&#8217;m always around to respond&#8230;Blackberry glued to my hand&#8230;if you don&#8217;t believe me ask my wife <img src='http://www.twitip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at it another way; if someone rings up a helpline and gets an answer phone, leaves a message, and then gets a prompt response the next day &#8211; then most people would be happy with that level of service. But it does depend on the context&#8230;if the message was &#8220;we&#8217;re on the shop, please call in&#8230;&#8221; then poor show, if the message was &#8220;Hey! we looking for your opinion on X&#8221; then fine&#8230;like many things it depends on context.</p>
<p>Engagement &amp; interaction are defo key&#8230;but not necessarily immediate imho.</p>
<p>Saying that I don&#8217;t  schedule tweets very often &#8211; like a specialist tool I use it when the occasion demands.</p>
<p>Nice chattin&#8217; to you.</p>
<p>Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiesha @ Highly Favored</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/to-schedule-tweets-or-not-to-tweet-2-reasons-you-should-schedule-tweets/#comment-73851</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiesha @ Highly Favored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2908#comment-73851</guid>
		<description>@Ross - I understand there are people that are there for just clicks, but I don&#039;t use Twitter to solely promote. I am in fact there to engage, I post both live tweets and scheduled tweets and I schedule them so that they don&#039;t all show up at once. I check in often, but isn&#039;t unrealistic to attempt to be on Twitter 24/7? When exactly are you supposed to engage people offline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ross &#8211; I understand there are people that are there for just clicks, but I don&#8217;t use Twitter to solely promote. I am in fact there to engage, I post both live tweets and scheduled tweets and I schedule them so that they don&#8217;t all show up at once. I check in often, but isn&#8217;t unrealistic to attempt to be on Twitter 24/7? When exactly are you supposed to engage people offline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

