<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweefind &#8211; Rank-based Twitter Search Engine Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/</link>
	<description>Twitter Tips in 140 Characters or More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Drop Shipping</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/#comment-41619</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Drop Shipping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2052#comment-41619</guid>
		<description>It would be awesome for us, non-english countries, to have a way to select which language we want the results.

Just my 2 cents....

Cheers!

Alex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be awesome for us, non-english countries, to have a way to select which language we want the results.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents&#8230;.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>Alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luca</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/#comment-41355</link>
		<dc:creator>luca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2052#comment-41355</guid>
		<description>@steve the rank is calculated by our algorithm, not Twitter, so it is not possible to improve it artificially</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@steve the rank is calculated by our algorithm, not Twitter, so it is not possible to improve it artificially</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accessible Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/#comment-41337</link>
		<dc:creator>Accessible Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2052#comment-41337</guid>
		<description>Lara, thanks for posting the link! I&#039;ll try it now. PS: I suggest adding a Submit button and a brief description of the service to the home page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lara, thanks for posting the link! I&#8217;ll try it now. PS: I suggest adding a Submit button and a brief description of the service to the home page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/#comment-41335</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2052#comment-41335</guid>
		<description>I like the ideal behind ranking results by user rank but people artificially improve their ranks on Twitter which limits the useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the ideal behind ranking results by user rank but people artificially improve their ranks on Twitter which limits the useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/#comment-41330</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2052#comment-41330</guid>
		<description>I tried it out. I wasn&#039;t really all that impressed. I searched on the word nature - 2 or 3 of the good nature tweeters I follow came up, but I know of a lot more who didn&#039;t appear and some of the people who came up seemed highly irrelevant. I had more success using #words.

I suspect there is no substitute for the legwork of finding a few good people to follow, reading their tweets, investigating the people they RT, and then following the ones you like. Checking out the tweets of every new person who follows you can be interesting too, but not as good as the other method. If you want to do the work you can browse through the followers of the people&#039;s who&#039;s tweets you like best to find more interesting folks, but that is highly time consuming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried it out. I wasn&#8217;t really all that impressed. I searched on the word nature &#8211; 2 or 3 of the good nature tweeters I follow came up, but I know of a lot more who didn&#8217;t appear and some of the people who came up seemed highly irrelevant. I had more success using #words.</p>
<p>I suspect there is no substitute for the legwork of finding a few good people to follow, reading their tweets, investigating the people they RT, and then following the ones you like. Checking out the tweets of every new person who follows you can be interesting too, but not as good as the other method. If you want to do the work you can browse through the followers of the people&#8217;s who&#8217;s tweets you like best to find more interesting folks, but that is highly time consuming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luca</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/#comment-41328</link>
		<dc:creator>luca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2052#comment-41328</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention. The link is http://www.tweefind.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention. The link is <a href="http://www.tweefind.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tweefind.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gino</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/#comment-41326</link>
		<dc:creator>Gino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2052#comment-41326</guid>
		<description>No link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chetan</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweefind-rank-based-twitter-search-engine-update/#comment-41325</link>
		<dc:creator>Chetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=2052#comment-41325</guid>
		<description>If Google is bringing in the microblogging search engine very soon, then these all services would get a slap, but till then Tweefind is a good engine.
The top tweeps feature for particular keywords is a good one. Its also showing related content from Google, Youtube etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google is bringing in the microblogging search engine very soon, then these all services would get a slap, but till then Tweefind is a good engine.<br />
The top tweeps feature for particular keywords is a good one. Its also showing related content from Google, Youtube etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

