<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TweetStalk &#8211; How to Follow someone on Twitter Without Them Knowing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/</link>
	<description>Twitter Tips in 140 Characters or More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 14:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-172199</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-172199</guid>
		<description>well t dont work with latest firefox. what version do i need ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well t dont work with latest firefox. what version do i need ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scooterinjapan</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-121312</link>
		<dc:creator>scooterinjapan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-121312</guid>
		<description>The reactions to TweetStalk are quite entertaining. Get over it, people. How is using TweetStalk any different from following someone&#039;s blog (it&#039;s called &quot;reading&quot;) without them or anyone else knowing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reactions to TweetStalk are quite entertaining. Get over it, people. How is using TweetStalk any different from following someone&#8217;s blog (it&#8217;s called &#8220;reading&#8221;) without them or anyone else knowing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin.g</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-92100</link>
		<dc:creator>robin.g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-92100</guid>
		<description>You could always just keep their page as a bookmark and look at it whenever you want to. You don&#039;t need to follow someone to see their page, unless their settings are that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could always just keep their page as a bookmark and look at it whenever you want to. You don&#8217;t need to follow someone to see their page, unless their settings are that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nota Stalker</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-76473</link>
		<dc:creator>Nota Stalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-76473</guid>
		<description>I wanted to use it to follow someone without them thinking I was stalking them. Ironic, innit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to use it to follow someone without them thinking I was stalking them. Ironic, innit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-44429</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-44429</guid>
		<description>Could this be a reason why number of followers Twitter counts often differs from the number that can be accounted for when checking the list visually?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be a reason why number of followers Twitter counts often differs from the number that can be accounted for when checking the list visually?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-32045</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-32045</guid>
		<description>Stalking online - you&#039;re kidding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stalking online &#8211; you&#8217;re kidding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebSuccessDiva Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>WebSuccessDiva Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m  on the same road as you, I don&#039;t really get the point in following people so they don&#039;t know?  It&#039;s kind of creepy if you ask me :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m  on the same road as you, I don&#8217;t really get the point in following people so they don&#8217;t know?  It&#8217;s kind of creepy if you ask me <img src='http://www.twitip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>@ Jon Henshaw
Yes, what a happy pursuit that must be for you. 
You could even incorporate those objectives into the company&#039;s mission statement.
Noble.
Thanks for your intellectual contribution to building communities.
Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jon Henshaw<br />
Yes, what a happy pursuit that must be for you.<br />
You could even incorporate those objectives into the company&#8217;s mission statement.<br />
Noble.<br />
Thanks for your intellectual contribution to building communities.<br />
Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>@Renee, but there would be no fun with that ;) I do admit...I enjoy watching people get worked up over nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Renee, but there would be no fun with that <img src='http://www.twitip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I do admit&#8230;I enjoy watching people get worked up over nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/tweetstalk-how-to-follow-someone-on-twitter-without-them-knowing/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/?p=507#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>Henshaw: &quot;For all of those who are creeped and freaked out over the service, you need to get past the name...The name was for fun...It&#039;s either something you want to use or it isn’t, but stop blowing things way out of proportion.&quot;

Marketer: You&#039;re right. TweetStalk should not be taken seriously. If Raven SEO Tools had intended to brand TweetStalk as a tool you/they would have considered a name that suggests it actually is a tool (and not a joke). You might have given it a name that inspired credibility and not controversy. 
Guess some people don&#039;t think &quot;stalk&quot; is a fun word. Go figure?

If the name of the &quot;stalk tool&quot; wasn&#039;t enough to turn a potential user off, then surely words like &quot;whining&quot; and &quot;ridiculous&quot; should do the trick.  Guessing the clients of the Raven brand get a gentler response to customer concerns/feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henshaw: &#8220;For all of those who are creeped and freaked out over the service, you need to get past the name&#8230;The name was for fun&#8230;It&#8217;s either something you want to use or it isn’t, but stop blowing things way out of proportion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Marketer: You&#8217;re right. TweetStalk should not be taken seriously. If Raven SEO Tools had intended to brand TweetStalk as a tool you/they would have considered a name that suggests it actually is a tool (and not a joke). You might have given it a name that inspired credibility and not controversy.<br />
Guess some people don&#8217;t think &#8220;stalk&#8221; is a fun word. Go figure?</p>
<p>If the name of the &#8220;stalk tool&#8221; wasn&#8217;t enough to turn a potential user off, then surely words like &#8220;whining&#8221; and &#8220;ridiculous&#8221; should do the trick.  Guessing the clients of the Raven brand get a gentler response to customer concerns/feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

