<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Tweeks Title Tags and Ranks Higher For Your Name &#8211; What do you Think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/</link>
	<description>Twitter Tips in 140 Characters or More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:03:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Pieniazek</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29948</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pieniazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29948</guid>
		<description>My twitter username is my real name, so my profile title says Adam Pieniazek (AdamPieniazek) on Twitter. Seems they&#039;d get nailed for dupe content with that setup, and right now Twitter is #10 in a google search for my name, while flickr, linkedin, and facebook are in the top five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My twitter username is my real name, so my profile title says Adam Pieniazek (AdamPieniazek) on Twitter. Seems they&#8217;d get nailed for dupe content with that setup, and right now Twitter is #10 in a google search for my name, while flickr, linkedin, and facebook are in the top five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29941</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29941</guid>
		<description>From an inbound marketing standpoint, I think this can be a good thing.  After all, Twitter is giving more information (that we can control) to search engines, which is basically a good thing for SEO.   But if all Twitter did was add the account name to the  tag, then it won&#039;t make a huge difference.  After all, when our potential customers search for something, it&#039;s rarely our name or company name.  

You know what I&#039;d pay money for?  A separate page for each of my tweets, with an HMTL template that I can modify, just like my blog.   Bar that, I have a plugin for Firefox that shows me Twitter search results on top of my regular Google results.  If more people had this functionality installed by default - and they might if Google buys Twitter - then Twitter would become a savage beast of inbound marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an inbound marketing standpoint, I think this can be a good thing.  After all, Twitter is giving more information (that we can control) to search engines, which is basically a good thing for SEO.   But if all Twitter did was add the account name to the  tag, then it won&#8217;t make a huge difference.  After all, when our potential customers search for something, it&#8217;s rarely our name or company name.  </p>
<p>You know what I&#8217;d pay money for?  A separate page for each of my tweets, with an HMTL template that I can modify, just like my blog.   Bar that, I have a plugin for Firefox that shows me Twitter search results on top of my regular Google results.  If more people had this functionality installed by default &#8211; and they might if Google buys Twitter &#8211; then Twitter would become a savage beast of inbound marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29928</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29928</guid>
		<description>There are a number variables you must consider before drawing any conclusions. Most of which are beyond the scope of this comment.

My own name was at #1  before  Twitter evolved. The fact that I now have the same twitter name seems to have very little impact on the search results.

At this moment in time LinkedIn provides #2 for me after bryanquinn.com (not me) and 
Twitter  provides  #12 slot. There are more important links that I know will get #1 spot but it is not one of my priorities for now. My only surprise is that twitter has overtaken facebook in the search game. 

Time for a Google Slap?



have not used to advantage recently</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number variables you must consider before drawing any conclusions. Most of which are beyond the scope of this comment.</p>
<p>My own name was at #1  before  Twitter evolved. The fact that I now have the same twitter name seems to have very little impact on the search results.</p>
<p>At this moment in time LinkedIn provides #2 for me after bryanquinn.com (not me) and<br />
Twitter  provides  #12 slot. There are more important links that I know will get #1 spot but it is not one of my priorities for now. My only surprise is that twitter has overtaken facebook in the search game. </p>
<p>Time for a Google Slap?</p>
<p>have not used to advantage recently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McKay</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29917</guid>
		<description>My previous comment showed up as &quot;anonymous&quot; with none of the text. Sigh. 

My own website still shows up #1 for my name, which I apparently share with a fairly famous musician. My twitter name is #7. In between are obvious imposters who have clearly hijacked my name for their own nefarious purpose. :-) They&#039;ll be hearing from my attorneys...

PS: I originally mis-typed &quot;nefarious&quot; as &quot;nefartious&quot; heh-heh. That really stinks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My previous comment showed up as &#8220;anonymous&#8221; with none of the text. Sigh. </p>
<p>My own website still shows up #1 for my name, which I apparently share with a fairly famous musician. My twitter name is #7. In between are obvious imposters who have clearly hijacked my name for their own nefarious purpose. <img src='http://www.twitip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  They&#8217;ll be hearing from my attorneys&#8230;</p>
<p>PS: I originally mis-typed &#8220;nefarious&#8221; as &#8220;nefartious&#8221; heh-heh. That really stinks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McKay</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29916</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-29916</guid>
		<description>My own website still ranks first for my name (which apparently I share with a fairly famous musician). My twitter page comes in #7, which is amazing since I started twittering less than a week ago. In between #1 and #7 are some obvious imposters who have hijacked my name. :-) They will be hearing from my lawyers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own website still ranks first for my name (which apparently I share with a fairly famous musician). My twitter page comes in #7, which is amazing since I started twittering less than a week ago. In between #1 and #7 are some obvious imposters who have hijacked my name. <img src='http://www.twitip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  They will be hearing from my lawyers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Bifulco</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28951</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Bifulco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28951</guid>
		<description>Very interesting - I just googled myself and my Twitter profile is # 1.  I guess this emphasizes the point that you should be mindful of what you Tweet ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting &#8211; I just googled myself and my Twitter profile is # 1.  I guess this emphasizes the point that you should be mindful of what you Tweet &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Foley - Online Dating Profiler</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28663</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Foley - Online Dating Profiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28663</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s pretty interesting and am curious to see how it works out.  Here are my stats:

For Online Dating Profiler (new site launched a couple weeks ago):
- Site name is PR 1
- Twitter account is PR 5 (under more of myself and my other blog)

For Geek&#039;s Dream Girl (my blog, just a little over a year old):
- Site name is PR 1
- Twitter account (@geeksdreamgirl) is PR 5 (under more of myself, blog catalog, and a quiz on okcupid that&#039;s unrelated to me)

 In the end, I&#039;m just concerned that people find me, not necessarily HOW they find me.   Any traffic is good traffic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty interesting and am curious to see how it works out.  Here are my stats:</p>
<p>For Online Dating Profiler (new site launched a couple weeks ago):<br />
- Site name is PR 1<br />
- Twitter account is PR 5 (under more of myself and my other blog)</p>
<p>For Geek&#8217;s Dream Girl (my blog, just a little over a year old):<br />
- Site name is PR 1<br />
- Twitter account (@geeksdreamgirl) is PR 5 (under more of myself, blog catalog, and a quiz on okcupid that&#8217;s unrelated to me)</p>
<p> In the end, I&#8217;m just concerned that people find me, not necessarily HOW they find me.   Any traffic is good traffic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28384</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28384</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;m not overly happy about it. As a result I&#039;ve logged a call with Twitter support to change my user name.

The problem is, and it&#039;s something I&#039;ve wrestled with for a while now, that my online &#039;brand&#039; is split between 2-3 areas and I have concerns about the overlap. I&#039;m in the process of trying to rebrand &quot;online Mike&quot; so that it doesn&#039;t affect &quot;offline Mike&quot; but this is going to take time. This change by Twitter has simply added to the problem.

It&#039;s a good move for Twitter and it&#039;s probably a good move for the vast majority of Twitter users but for me it couldn&#039;t have come at a worse time :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;m not overly happy about it. As a result I&#8217;ve logged a call with Twitter support to change my user name.</p>
<p>The problem is, and it&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve wrestled with for a while now, that my online &#8216;brand&#8217; is split between 2-3 areas and I have concerns about the overlap. I&#8217;m in the process of trying to rebrand &#8220;online Mike&#8221; so that it doesn&#8217;t affect &#8220;offline Mike&#8221; but this is going to take time. This change by Twitter has simply added to the problem.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good move for Twitter and it&#8217;s probably a good move for the vast majority of Twitter users but for me it couldn&#8217;t have come at a worse time <img src='http://www.twitip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28058</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28058</guid>
		<description>Makes some sense that it would rank higher, for a lot of people Twitter is their most active online presence so has the most fresh content for Google to see each time it crawls their profile.

For people serious about managing their personal brand it should be easy enough to apply some SEO or focus their attention to the places they want to rank higher than Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes some sense that it would rank higher, for a lot of people Twitter is their most active online presence so has the most fresh content for Google to see each time it crawls their profile.</p>
<p>For people serious about managing their personal brand it should be easy enough to apply some SEO or focus their attention to the places they want to rank higher than Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Atkins</title>
		<link>http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28053</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitip.com/twitter-tweeks-title-tags-and-ranks-higher-for-your-name-what-do-you-think/#comment-28053</guid>
		<description>My main Twitter account had a Google PageRank of 6 shortly after creating my account.  I knew then and there that Twitter was going to soon start capturing a ton of search visitors.  Twitter is fairly well SEO&#039;d as is and it&#039;s really easy for Google to spider.

I&#039;m not concerned about my Twitter account having a high page rank.  In fact, that&#039;s a blessing.  It can be used to help shape traffic on other websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main Twitter account had a Google PageRank of 6 shortly after creating my account.  I knew then and there that Twitter was going to soon start capturing a ton of search visitors.  Twitter is fairly well SEO&#8217;d as is and it&#8217;s really easy for Google to spider.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not concerned about my Twitter account having a high page rank.  In fact, that&#8217;s a blessing.  It can be used to help shape traffic on other websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
